A Cancer Cure 40 years ago

The Unacceptable risks of "The Public Health Movement"

It would not take a large feat of mathematical calculations, to prove that the United Nations, and the World Health Organization primarily, over the past fifty years alone, has produced higher sum and total levels of morbidity and mortality, than 5000 years of all the other organized religions combined.


Public Health has moved where they always move, at the beginning of the end, of the same old same old, self imposed, mutual admiration society, of condescending prohibitionist elites. Fashioning the same uprising we have seen time and time again, over hundreds of years.

Holding the scepter of moral supremacy, is like holding a live grenade, for someone in the medical profession.

Like the champions of reefer madness, and the fascists before them, their fate is already sealed.

Risk is an emotional evaluation and the terrorists of the AMA are armed almost exclusively, with ammunition provided by junk science protagonists and the prostitutes of "Passivrauchen".

Always about the money.

http://www.manhealthissue.com/2007/06/epidemiologists-vote-to-keep-doing-junk-science.html

Like Electronic Cigarettes, "second hand smoke" exists as a health risk, or weapon of choice, only because the medical community decided, and quite deliberately, to eliminate the possibility that either could be harmless. "No safe level of tobacco smoke" joins with "what could happen if vaping became a trend". Speculation and emotional measures [AKA "Risk Assessments"], to undermine both common sense and free autonomous choices, without "medical community morality" based opposition. Choices made by the only people with a legal right to make them, is the only actual risk of any significant value here at all. "The Public Health Movement" [CULT] promotes something completely different and they do so, using your own money and government resources, as if they were their own.

People making their own choices, in the management of their own bodies, is the only issue being addressed here, above and to the diminishment of all others.

Even after hanging a number of them, for precisely this same activity, at the end of both; the war and the bigoted lies of eugenics, they are back to haunt us once again. Demanding control  and obedience, in a world fashioned to their liking, at the expense of a legal right to our own.

"Health risk assessments" are emotional measures, more profoundly stated in "what you can be made to believe", than any attachments to science or logical followings. Risk is therefore only a bandwagon or popular belief mechanism, which we know and see in propaganda. Always a component of self sanctimony and underlying opportunistic agenda. A perspective which is self aggrandizing, increasing with each iteration of its deceptions and half truth lies.

http://members.iinet.com.au/~ray/TSSOASb.html

"Science is not always a neutral, disinterested search for knowledge, although it may often seem that way to the outsider. Sometimes the story can be very different."

"The Royal College of Physicians of London promoted smoking for its benefits to health and advised which brands were best. Smoking was compulsory in schools. An Eton schoolboy later recalled that "he was never whipped so much in his life as he was one morning for not smoking". As recently as 1942 Price’s textbook of medicine recommended smoking to relieve asthma."

Health risks are said to be what we should avoid in order to maintain our health. In a more reasonable sense, that is truth by half truth. Whitehall determined that stress is the largest risk to human health. Promotions of the Public Health Movement, are almost exclusively targeting other risks and in so doing have imposed tremendous and absolutely unnecessary stress on entire populations. The measure of that damage and the mortality that flowed from it, should be seen to be profound. Public Health and it's recently increased capacity to impose stress on populations world wide, is in fact the largest and the most preventable health risk in world history. We should have hanged more of them. Or perhaps the hangings should be started anew. Because the message seems to have been lost in their promotions and ever endemic sense of sociopathological pride, in what they have already done.

When the Apartheid Government didn't want to look at the Black Ghettos in South Africa back in 1955, they used Public Health as the excuse for their laws, when they demolished the ghettos and drove Mandela along with the poorest and most defenseless among them, away from their beautified cities. When Hitler decided that Jews smelled bad and he passed laws designating eating establishments; non Jews only. Again they pointed at Public Health and "the protections of children" as their excuse. When they killed the hospital patients classified as "useless eaters" the Public Health advocates stood proudly at the lead of that Protection of peoples children, Said to be forced to live in poverty, by the tremendous cost of feeding the unproductive. In America whites only drinking fountains along with may Eugenics based bigotry laws, were once again a "Health issue" for the protection of God's children".

How much we spend on Public Health today is abominable. Considering the constant drive of avoiding "preventable diseases" and as the plank of everything they promote, rests in blame the victim campaigns. Protecting self sanctimony, from the threats or risks imposed by others. While those risks are only a formation of ignorance developed in communities divided upon themselves.. Ad agency inspired stereotypes drawn from half truths and outright lies, are not science, nor do they enrich the common good. Agenda and opportunistic hate campaigns are all that is purchased with the 59 Billion dollars invested every year, when invested in ignorance and our own shame.

http://www.swalkerbryant.com/2...

http://www.cdc.gov/od/ocphp/np...

"A recent report from the Alliance for Health Reform, an advocacy group, notes that nationally the U.S. spends more than 16 percent of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP), or about $2 trillion on treating preventable illness and injury. We spend only 3 percent, or $59 billion, on government public health services, long understood to be our first line of defense against disease and disaster."

CDC 
"Center for Disease Control"

"And Prevention" is something they added on, in-house.

As a reflection of the political emergence of a different agency entirely, built from the self sanctimony and financial conflicts of interest within.

The Rest of the Story: Tobacco News Analysis and Commentary: CDC Concludes that Advertising is What Has Caused ...

The Rest of the Story: Tobacco News Analysis and Commentary: CDC Concludes that Advertising is What Has Caused ...: In an interview with WebMD , a CDC tobacco control expert concludes that the reason youth are using electronic cigarettes is the advertisin...

My Letter To Health Canada

Today it is a familiar process. Hire a lobby to define a fear no matter how unlikely, and demand government "protection". The government that hired them gives in and sets up control. As quick as a wink your rights disappear as if by magic, with the talking heads in the media telling you what a great thing the government has done. protecting us against our own choices and freedoms.

People keep marveling at the density of their neighbors heads, in wonderment of what is happening around them,. it isn't so difficult to understand, if you see the con for what it is. A process that undermines and eliminates all of the powers, we used to share in the Canadian Constitution.

The constitution is your only power over government. When the government "protects" us, or our children, The government in reality takes control of us.

I wrote this letter two weeks ago.

To date I received no response from the numerous Government officials and agencies who received it including Health Canada.



Hello,

I am at odds to see a distinction between a conference Board of Canada report and a similar finding announced in 1939 in Germany.. The document in question on the Health Canada website can be found at this link

http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hc-ps/pubs/tobac-tabac/bottomline-bilan/index-eng.php#a4.2


Summary Table 1 - The Annual Cost of Employing Smokers (1995 $ per employee)
Cost Factor                                                               Cost
Increased absenteeism                                                   $230
Decreased productivity                                                  $2,175
Increased life insurance premiums                                   $75
Smoking area costs                                                         $85

Source: The Conference Board of Canada.



And a sample of the other discussion which seems to have absolute conformity can be found at wiki, among many other places where human rights and autonomy rights are the focus.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F...

"This poster (from around 1938) reads: "60,000 Reichsmark is what this person suffering from a hereditary defect costs the People's community during his lifetime. Fellow citizen, that is your money too. Read '[A] New People', the monthly magazine of the Bureau for Race Politics of the NSDAP."




If Health Canada and all of it's experts depict smoking as an addiction. It can not be argued it is not a medical condition. If it is a medical condition; hatred, isolation, taxes and funding hate groups, is not in compliance with the way other medical conditions are treated in this country, notwithstanding these identical "treatments" beyond informed consent, are well known to have existed in one place in history alone, the place that invented without any form of medical oversight or opinion, the fears and danger of tobacco smoke. Within an identical promotion complete with nearly identical slogans and emotionally manipulative talking points. The very essence of the negative connotation, of the word Propaganda as it is now understood.



If in fact Health Canada under the funded lobby group campaigns known officially as "De-normalization" is not in fact involving itself in dehumanization, one would have to look very hard to see any remote sign of distinction. This article and the need seen to create it, takes away all possibilities of denial. Is it the belief that the "common good" as defined by Health Canada employees for what ever reasons they form those beliefs, should be achieved beyond all moral restraint and measures of ethical values?

This campaign financed with the public purse is repulsive and disgusting to me. It is a promotion clearly defined to achieve the diminished existence of human rights, autonomy rights and security of the person
By a Government acting as a bully, setting an example to entitle other bullies. It is a promotion of hatred and bigotry, so vile that it approaches the hatred that existed in support of another paternalist regime, that cost millions, and many of them Canadian, lives to extinguish. To even recognize a Canadian Government involved in this activity sickens me and demands I stand in contempt of this Government and it's hires and will make every effort to assure that good and moral Canadians understand, what it is you are doing, in hopes that they will see it in numbers and demand criminal prosecutions under hate crimes legislation and human rights abuses. laws clearly describing your current activities.

I hear all the time from Government financed and community divisive Lobby groups, that "a smokers rights end at the tip of a non smoker's nose." This, in recognition of the fact that all of our rights are contained in the same document; disguises the fact, that where ever a smoker's rights end, so do all rights end. If this is the governments intention to dilute or eliminate the Constitution while providing Billions of dollars from the public purse, to achieve those goals, by Political promotions in the one party fake Liberal media; This Government is criminal and this form of government should not stand.

I remember reading in the first convention of tobacco control at Health Canada's website. A discussion of paid lobby groups with the Health Ministry, who are tax exempted as "charities" or "non profit foundations" While funded by the government for their efforts with funding today provided to the Government, primarily by their victims. As a discussion of mean spirited acts that the lobby groups would engage in, one comment stuck in my memory. "This will make smokers mad and force the government to come in as an honest broker to intervene". Clearly this is no longer available on the website as it was then, however the minutes of that meeting are public property and under the access of information act, they should be available to any inquiry. This is evidence of intent and conspired activity, that defines the goal of Government to divide communities in order to promote a need for government intervention.

Paternalist Protections require that Government take control. Which would entail by bigoted means, an elimination of personal rights. McGuintyism as it is known is the more deviant fine print extreme of McCarthyism, encompassed an identical methodology, to undermine personal rights and freedoms in all of the Ontario Government ministries

As a current example, with the new Metro-links ad campaigns, by a group who advertise themselves as a government "advisory board" the Government is currently utilizing the same strategy, of deceptive advertising and scarevertizing, as entitlement of a project, to supposedly eliminate congestion on the roads. With the first advisement without any quotes in hand, any form of plan, or list of projects "the cost at 40 billion dollars" was the first statement made, and the only consistent goal presented. Similar to government funded research studies, within a regime of absolute publication biases in the medical journals, statistical research with a consistent outcome signifies corruption of process, while virtually all Government funded "studies" have a conclusion stated, before, the public purse investments in that research is made.

Encroachments of personal rights and freedoms in the form of smoking bans, in place of more respectful signs on the door, allowing autonomy and choice and the retention of private property management, in the hands of those who own those properties. Is now a keystone of the example set at the federal level, providing an anti-autonomy process, ballooning exponentially across all government ministries.

*The taking of personal property, jail and suspensions of licenses, before a trial as an inconsistent application of speed limit laws.

*Drunk driving convictions with breath samples below the level anyone would be intoxicated,

*The CVOR legislation which demand tasks be provided, without compensation and a fine for doing those tasks in ways that do not meet any sparsely trained examiners expectations.

*Labor laws demanding micro-managed licensing of all the abilities, of any single trade, at a large expense in maintaining those licenses, with a consistent fine, taking of a right to earn a living and possible jail time for non compliance.

*All within a presumption of guilt, a denial of adult competence or mature cognitive ability.

*Propped up by slogans "there is no such thing as an accident", or at the Ministry of transport, declaring the Ministry of Transport as a kingdom, above the constitution or the courts, with the statement that "driving is not a right but a privilege" granted therein.

* Add in, as demonstrated by the PST HST and GST laws, the government's position that work is not recognized as legal property, and even if it is, property, no rights exist to protect one's property against government seizures, So free work [as slavery] can be demanded and by the examples set, would now withstand a constitutional challenge. Leaving Governments of the belief that compensation is not required, in spite of a history of supreme court decisions to the contrary.

All of these examples clearly indicate, the Government sees our rights as an obstacle and undeserved. Governments at all levels are purchasing politics by expansive wedge based ad campaigns, in pursuit of power and control, clear attacks and diminishment of personal rights to the highest possible degree.

*With "earned media" singing along, in exchange for the continuation of those purchases, If it restricts our rights and freedoms Payola depicts that Governments can never be wrong.

All the media representations are heralding the "WE" campaign this week, a fortuitous encroachment of political encroachments on our children's education systems. With promotions right in our classrooms, the one place where children should be taught how to think and not what. With promotion in attendance at a teen idol, musical concert, where you can't buy a ticket you have to "earn it " agreeing to support the industrial socialist and fascist ideals of it's promoters. With the knowledge that if you can subvert a generation of children, you can control the politics of the next. This should be seen as an act being challenged, as unethical and harmful to a child's natural development, not cheered by the talking heads.

Does Health Canada or the larger Public Health "Movement" [or cult] have an image or persona they will soon be placing on my door for salute or daily rituals, whenever I enter that door? Or is the fact that I still have a door, now an offense to your sensibilities and Public Health directives as well?

Health groups are divining the obese and smokers and any number of innocent law abiding citizens as targets, assigned for future "campaigns" at the financially corrupted World Health Organization. In support only of, for profit "stakeholder partners", any search on the internet of the word "Dehumanization" leads us to the undeniable conclusion, that Public Health, The medical Charities and Medicine [who define the majority of people as a disease requiring treatment] in Canada, are standing in a mad man's shoes, while promoting their risk adverse cast designated self sanctimony, as protective benevolent and holy, just as he did.

With expenditures topping 100 Billion Dollars in Canada, by the anti-smoker movement alone, in support of Social engineering, community divisive hate campaigns and the reams of statistical nonsense, produced over the past decade?. For every one Billion dollars you loose the opportunity to invest in 1000, million dollar investigations in real medical research and science, while those researchers who are currently starved for funding, would gladly trade a limb for that level of funding. Dealing with real disease and health risk reductions in the physical world, beyond social engineering, and the bold print dividing us upon ourselves, by elimination of human rights and autonomy, emotional manipulations, playing up ignorance as evidence from a materialist perspective alone, contrasted with allowing people to retain their rights security, dignity and position, as government employers,

No longer governed by Public Servants. It is the People who are now described by "Public health professionals" as a litany of  "disgusting" diseases.

One hundred thousand opportunities lost to date and not one person served.