A Cancer Cure 40 years ago

The Unacceptable risks of "The Public Health Movement"

It would not take a large feat of mathematical calculations, to prove that the United Nations, and the World Health Organization primarily, over the past fifty years alone, has produced higher sum and total levels of morbidity and mortality, than 5000 years of all the other organized religions combined.


Public Health has moved where they always move, at the beginning of the end, of the same old same old, self imposed, mutual admiration society, of condescending prohibitionist elites. Fashioning the same uprising we have seen time and time again, over hundreds of years.

Holding the scepter of moral supremacy, is like holding a live grenade, for someone in the medical profession.

Like the champions of reefer madness, and the fascists before them, their fate is already sealed.

Risk is an emotional evaluation and the terrorists of the AMA are armed almost exclusively, with ammunition provided by junk science protagonists and the prostitutes of "Passivrauchen".

Always about the money.

http://www.manhealthissue.com/2007/06/epidemiologists-vote-to-keep-doing-junk-science.html

Like Electronic Cigarettes, "second hand smoke" exists as a health risk, or weapon of choice, only because the medical community decided, and quite deliberately, to eliminate the possibility that either could be harmless. "No safe level of tobacco smoke" joins with "what could happen if vaping became a trend". Speculation and emotional measures [AKA "Risk Assessments"], to undermine both common sense and free autonomous choices, without "medical community morality" based opposition. Choices made by the only people with a legal right to make them, is the only actual risk of any significant value here at all. "The Public Health Movement" [CULT] promotes something completely different and they do so, using your own money and government resources, as if they were their own.

People making their own choices, in the management of their own bodies, is the only issue being addressed here, above and to the diminishment of all others.

Even after hanging a number of them, for precisely this same activity, at the end of both; the war and the bigoted lies of eugenics, they are back to haunt us once again. Demanding control  and obedience, in a world fashioned to their liking, at the expense of a legal right to our own.

"Health risk assessments" are emotional measures, more profoundly stated in "what you can be made to believe", than any attachments to science or logical followings. Risk is therefore only a bandwagon or popular belief mechanism, which we know and see in propaganda. Always a component of self sanctimony and underlying opportunistic agenda. A perspective which is self aggrandizing, increasing with each iteration of its deceptions and half truth lies.

http://members.iinet.com.au/~ray/TSSOASb.html

"Science is not always a neutral, disinterested search for knowledge, although it may often seem that way to the outsider. Sometimes the story can be very different."

"The Royal College of Physicians of London promoted smoking for its benefits to health and advised which brands were best. Smoking was compulsory in schools. An Eton schoolboy later recalled that "he was never whipped so much in his life as he was one morning for not smoking". As recently as 1942 Price’s textbook of medicine recommended smoking to relieve asthma."

Health risks are said to be what we should avoid in order to maintain our health. In a more reasonable sense, that is truth by half truth. Whitehall determined that stress is the largest risk to human health. Promotions of the Public Health Movement, are almost exclusively targeting other risks and in so doing have imposed tremendous and absolutely unnecessary stress on entire populations. The measure of that damage and the mortality that flowed from it, should be seen to be profound. Public Health and it's recently increased capacity to impose stress on populations world wide, is in fact the largest and the most preventable health risk in world history. We should have hanged more of them. Or perhaps the hangings should be started anew. Because the message seems to have been lost in their promotions and ever endemic sense of sociopathological pride, in what they have already done.

When the Apartheid Government didn't want to look at the Black Ghettos in South Africa back in 1955, they used Public Health as the excuse for their laws, when they demolished the ghettos and drove Mandela along with the poorest and most defenseless among them, away from their beautified cities. When Hitler decided that Jews smelled bad and he passed laws designating eating establishments; non Jews only. Again they pointed at Public Health and "the protections of children" as their excuse. When they killed the hospital patients classified as "useless eaters" the Public Health advocates stood proudly at the lead of that Protection of peoples children, Said to be forced to live in poverty, by the tremendous cost of feeding the unproductive. In America whites only drinking fountains along with may Eugenics based bigotry laws, were once again a "Health issue" for the protection of God's children".

How much we spend on Public Health today is abominable. Considering the constant drive of avoiding "preventable diseases" and as the plank of everything they promote, rests in blame the victim campaigns. Protecting self sanctimony, from the threats or risks imposed by others. While those risks are only a formation of ignorance developed in communities divided upon themselves.. Ad agency inspired stereotypes drawn from half truths and outright lies, are not science, nor do they enrich the common good. Agenda and opportunistic hate campaigns are all that is purchased with the 59 Billion dollars invested every year, when invested in ignorance and our own shame.

http://www.swalkerbryant.com/2...

http://www.cdc.gov/od/ocphp/np...

"A recent report from the Alliance for Health Reform, an advocacy group, notes that nationally the U.S. spends more than 16 percent of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP), or about $2 trillion on treating preventable illness and injury. We spend only 3 percent, or $59 billion, on government public health services, long understood to be our first line of defense against disease and disaster."

CDC 
"Center for Disease Control"

"And Prevention" is something they added on, in-house.

As a reflection of the political emergence of a different agency entirely, built from the self sanctimony and financial conflicts of interest within.