A terror from within

In response to the recent claims of our health ministries and the tax trough paid legion of health care professionals;

In reviewing the statements recently expressing the ideas we are at risk of terrorists from within our population. How would we possibly connect the two? By definition, how do you describe a terrorist? We could see a terrorist as an individual or as a group, who support a justification of imposition, forcing their values on others which do not reflect those of community, by means of supplanted fear and intimidation. We know this in the term Denormalization as described and moralised at Health Canada.

Terrorist; One who promotes extremist fears or terror.

Basir speaks her values in terms of epidemics and pandemics despite no contagions are present to support such fears. Is she simply uneducated enough to believe her advisors that such a danger truly exists? or does she speak in political terms maximizing the effects of a 30 second sound bite, her assault on the psyche of those who would listen. She and her comrades in arms claimed a huge victory in the war on tobacco smoke recently with the imposed ban of smoking in newly acquired public spaces. Jim Watson claims the effects are already seen but we must go further in attacking the new Tobacco. The increasing threat in a fat pandemic which could, if left unchecked, erase the great gains in healthcare already achieved. Despite the growing lineups at hospital emergency rooms this is a terror which deserves 10s of millions in expenditures and increased taxes as a byproduct. In so doing destroying our shrinking personal economies which are irrefutably known to be the largest determinants in health and longevity. The polls of course say we support higher taxes??? No one could take issue with saving the precious children, or in Governments protecting us from ourselves. Prevention of using what is allowed to remain of a dollar earned, on anything which may increase personal harm, or is proven to be wrong headed can not be tolerated in our new civil society. The only thing absent, is a list of what will be permitted, which is a matter under constant negotiation.

In mussing, one could imagine Basir or Watson had they been born in Afghanistan or Iraq would they now be walking around with a bomb strapped to their bodies looking for a potential target? The similarity has it’s obvious detractors, however the similarities are too obvious to ignore. Terrorists seek to change what is normal they seek to disrupt our daily routines. Goals of such lobbies may be based in moral or for self serving objectives, in many cases it is hard to decide which is the case. Industries who sell competing products set their sights on revising Government policies in similar ways. Robert Wood Johnson went to great pains to first hold seminaries instructing the loyal to use children as a weapon in the war to gain support and sympathy. At the same time they financed the creation of SAMMEC research alterations to include the devastating effects on children for gaining public support. Unfortunately the one detractor in gaining that support was the science which could not support it. The calculations in Canada reporting 100 child mortalities and even giving exact numbers of gender could never be proven using standard methods of epidemiology which could never estimate a number so precise in a 32 million population. The list of those mortalities includes SIDS which as the name clearly states is a syndrome; that which can not be explained otherwise the term syndrome would not apply.

Already this week It is only Wednesday; CSPI a radical American lobby group declared war on fried chicken and coffee. Research on chlorene in swimming pools may be causing asthma. A review of a 20/20 report which shows Johnson and Johnson "The Family Company" is advising parents in commercials to wash childrens play areas and toys with toxic and carcinogenic products. A call to declare being tired at the wheel a crininal offense equivalent to drunk driving. Numerous declarations praising those at the battlefront figting the war on deadly cigarette second hand smoke. A deadly toxin which used to be thought to be killing 1000 Canadians every year, now known to cause the preventable deaths of one quarter of all mortality in Canada every year. Deadly with all exposures no matter at what level, sure to kill us all if action is not taken immediately to continue the fight until all traces of cigarette smoke is eliminated. The commons continues to debate the notion of taking all cars and trucks off the road to meet Kyoto objectives as the mega tons of polutants at Sarnia and Sudbury are incoinsequential and can not meet the obvious potential of personal responsibility, as demonstrated in the one ton challenge our only hope of survival. This morning a City TV upcoming report on the growing epidemic of table salt? Reflecting how many times I have observed the deadly salt placed next to water coolers, thought to replenish a body after excessive sweat. Or remembering my own mother who suffered from a goiter she was prescribed salt tablets to control the condition. Now I must be convinced salt which is a vital component in our bodies is now a deadly epidemic? The extremes these groups will go to in creation of fears is taking it’s toll in cry wolf terms. Smog days in Feb. Last year was taken as a non issue, despite the real fear and reaction it should have provoked. Instead the terrorists used the issue to promote industry protections in the Kyoto protocol plan protecting the benefactors who continue to profit while the rest of us choke. Inhaling the byproducts of their goods for sale. In Kyoto they have actually found a way to make us pay for those byproducts or what was formerly believed to be their waste.

We are taught to fear by our own government officials too young for the most part to remember a flaming speech by one of the most eloquent in our history Sir Winston Churchill, who once stated “we have nothing to fear but fear itself”. Now a terrorist government seeks through media presentations to denormalize us all with exaggerated fears and intimidations of those who will not yield. Child abuse accusations for parents who’s children are gleefully instructed in schools to question their smoking parents “why would you want me dead?” Yes, there is no doubt. If Basir or Watson allowed themselves the luxury of self examination when observing an Iraq militant with an RPG shouldered, celebrating the assault on his fellows. Or when reading the news reports, of the recently arrested home grown terrorists facing charges in our courts. The thought should come to them both loud and clear as it should to all who support Heath care advocacy in the supplanting of fears. There but the grace of God go I.

Of course being non moral eugenicists and politicians first, neither could accept a higher power, than that they have taken for their own.

It is surreal to live in a society which in training hand to hand combat or martial arts the first lesson deals with morals and ethics in use of your learned power. In contrast an education system with no such requirements which teaches moral and ethical leaders are found as a byproduct of success in a chosen field. The cream has finally risen to the top the successful get there because they have learned to ignore weakness of character now known as old school ethics or the values of dinosaurs.

You no longer have to travel to hidden training camps to learn the values of terror, there are many online resources available The Federal Government has a course on Social marketing at Health Canada found here

http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ahc-asc/activit/marketsoc/index_e.html

At the United Nations a similar course sure to raise the power of fear and intimidation to new heights.

Complete with a science tout jour smorgasbord. A resource of science creation to aid all campaigns.

http://www.who.int/hia/evidence/en/

From profiting industry stakeholders fine tuning the terrorist handbook

http://www.bmsg.org/pdfs/BMSG_AccelerationReport.pdf

In a nation dedicated to peace why are we continually at war with ourselves. Perhaps some of those fine Liberal values of live and let live have somehow gotten lost along the way, in creating our perfect civil society. The globalist dream creating a cashless society moralizing total populations of slaves to industry. All taught to be clones of puritanic yet politically correct immortals.

Damn the individualist army of wrong headed dinosaurs and insurgents crying for civil rights.

Most of us would support the value of observational science.

If this is the primary defence against healthcare terrorists.

How long before we will hear the call in stylised media announcements, to let the book burnings begin?

New age terrorists

Cause and effect is a term to be considered in political reality, if it moves tax it to death. Literally to death, the increase in violence resulting in higher mortality and depreciated standard of living throughout the free world can be seen in large part to poor management principles. Lobbies grow favor with Governments by presenting justifications for increased taxes. Politicians with a bigger purse can purchase votes with grandiose election promises never revealing the source of their new found wealth, always described as trimming the fat or reductions of government waste. Reductions will always be out of their grasp in maintaining a growing bureaucracy.

The Canadian leadership convention is abuzz with the debate over carbon taxes. What would be the effect of a huge carbon tax on industries who pollute? It doesn’t take a lot of imagination to understand in the same way Tobacco settlements were added to the cost of operations used as a tax deduction and passed on to the consumer along with the cost of any lost trade due to the process. The amounts paid to the government first would spend a lot of time in the industry coffers creating more wealth prior to payments. The consumer suffers increased cost lowered standard of living and poverty and through poverty grows violence. Industry profits rise net result even industry would support the carbon tax or any other such tax which would result increased cash flow and profitability while passing responsibility to the victims.

What would be gained as far as reducing carbon emissions? Their actually would be motivation to increase carbon emissions due to the profitable nature of increased product value. From an economic standpoint no motivation would be found in reducing anything. Mortality figures would increase making a carbon or any other tax a deadly solution from a community stand point. Legislation has other options including criminality which could apply however in protections of industry their paid lobbies would never allow such a move to become popular. Personal responsibility seems to be the solution which would limit the profit if we could just take the credibility away from the terrorists paid by industry to lobby.

Terrorist seems like an odd description here but in fact it is closer to the truth than anyone realizes. When you break down terrorism how would we describe it? Through fear they motivate others to make changes in lifestyle or routine, to be noticed by changing what is normal, Denormalization if you will. Fear of gas attacks in subways or bombs on aircraft scare people into seeking other means of transportation. Suicide bombers restrict movement in busy streets affecting commerce. Anti war sentiments give them power through the discussions in the media they increase notoriety and because they are noticed making them successful in their strategies. Drawing attention through daily presentations in the world press motivates many young people to join them as a protest against intolerable living conditions.

Hate is easy to produce if you target the right demographic. Smoking was just such a target many people have seen family members die due to a coined term created to eliminate other suspects “smoking related disease” how hard would it be to gain support among those who could be easily convinced cigarettes were to blame regardless of what actually was? Many in the population who don’t smoke simply don’t like the smell so anything could be accepted which would allow them to avoid a smell. Anything includes accepting ridiculous claims as long as those claims are not seen to affect their life or routine. Fear will gain the support of many more, 47,000 preventable deaths creates this fear 100 senseless child mortalities, Pictures on cigarette packages and TV commercials depicting cancer patients provides a suitable arsenal of anti tank missiles RPGs and suicide bomb belts to disrupt society and routines to the point their can be no resistance. The power of fear when the nation’s media and politicians voice those fears they become much more of a motivator to react.

The British have been a constant target of fear campaigns for many years in recent history with the bombings during the war they learned to stand in determination to never give in to fears. Encouraged by the voice of Winston Churchill defiance in the face of violence created by acts of terror. Later with IRA bombings the public although much more guarded still remained defiant in the face of those who sought to make them fear. Now with the Alkaida terrorists again that resolve is tested throughout the community to never give in to the imposition of fears.

North America could do well in taking a lesson from the Brits. In judging charity campaigns of self serving charity foundations. In assessing government actions parroted by lobby groups in the media and in look at what fears are being taught in our schools displayed on cigarette packages or pronounced by snake oil salespeople claiming to be health care professionals. A hate campaign in Ontario tests the limits of civility A website named stupid. A propaganda ministry [Health information] and threats from a Government official quit or be punished.

We used to respect punishment was for the courts now Government seeks to bypass trials and the courts. To affect punishment directly in assuming all citizens are criminals, guilty until proven innocent. The dictatorial mould of imposed fines which require action on the part of the victim to prove innocence as opposed to being proven guilty prior to punishment, could pose an interesting constitutional challenge in judging the legitimacy of the word of law.

With a total lack in statistical, Biological or timeline observations the only available tool left to eliminate smoking was fear. Altering of public spaces property rights was a required ingredient slipped in with little public knowledge, necessity or consent. Negotiations including the other side in a peaceful resolution were never considered, as we are dealing with mean spirited oppressors determined to impose their power on an identified group. A group they deem to never have deserved civil rights or a place in community, regardless of accomplishments or contributions. A wide brushing of all those who are different and deserve to be punished for failure to comply. Smokers are the invisible enemy with no voice a larger group can not silence. Obese people will be the next untouchables to present a threat, requiring vilification and fears to be distributed to the masses as a pandemic which needs to be cured. Fear mongering needs to be the target to end tax oppressions and Violence in the streets. Power is being afforded to those who never deserved it operating outside community while stealing it’s voice to propagate more hate and fear. Tobacco control is terrorism in every definition of the word. We need to drag them into the light so community can judge those who terrorize our communities and destroy our quality of life.